|
Light
from the Sidra |
|
|
The Bible is a
very symbolic book. That is not to say the Hebrew Scriptures are
mythological or on a level with the Babylonian and Egyptian holy
writings. The Tanakh is a historically accurate collection of documents
that record God’s dealing with Israel and the nations. But within the
historical record are symbols evidently intended to teach Israel about
their God. The tabernacle
and the garments of the High Priest readily come to mind as examples of
such symbolism. The instructions for the building of God’s sanctuary
and the preparation of the High Priests’ “garments of glory” are very
precise, no doubt because the tabernacle and the priesthood were
intended to be divine object lessons for God’s people. Leviticus 24
contains the instructions for the preparation for “the bread of the
presence”. Twelve unleavened loaves of bread were placed in two rows on
the golden table in the tabernacle outside the veil, behind which God
himself dwelt. The twelve loaves obviously symbolised the twelve tribes
of Israel, but it is significant that there is no mention of leaven in
the bread. In the Bible, leaven, or yeast, is a potent symbol of sin.
When leaven, or yeast, is combined with dough, it begins to break down,
spread and corrupt, causing the dough to rise. In the bread of the
presence, representing the twelve tribes of Israel, God’s chosen
people, there was to be nothing that signified sin. The bread of the
presence therefore pictures an ideal Israel, a holy people totally
obedient to their God. In other words, the bread represents Israel in
the light of the high calling for which God had chosen them. When Balaam
looked on the camp of Israel with the eye of prophecy, he could say
that God had “not beheld iniquity in Jacob”, neither had he seen
“perversity in Israel” (Numbers 23:21). Was there no iniquity in Israel
during the wilderness years? Of course. But Balaam saw Israel in the
light of God's eternal purpose. There were other
symbols for the twelve tribes of Israel. The two onyx stones with six
of the names of the tribes of Israel on each of them, which were placed
upon the shoulders of the ephod of the High Priest, and the four rows
of three precious stones which were on his breastplate - twelve in
total - symbolised the twelve tribes of Israel. The High Priest
symbolically represented the people of Israel when he stood before the
Lord in the holy of holies. When Aaron entered the holy of holies on
Yom Kippur, he symbolically bore the nation on his shoulders in order
to intercede for them and atone for their sins. His entry into
the holy of holies was once a year, but the bread of the presence
reminded the twelve tribes that they were continually before the
presence of the Lord. Because of this these twelve loaves are sometimes
called the “continual bread” (Lechem haTamid – “the bread which is
always there”). They also signify that God sees the twelve tribes of
Israel as an indivisible unit, a truth reinforced by Elijah when he
built an altar of twelve stones “according to the twelve tribes of the
sons of Jacob”. At that time the nation was divided into the kingdom of
Israel and the kingdom of Judah, but the prophet Elijah saw them as God
saw them, one indivisible body. The New Testament
confirms the truth of Israel’s unity and looks forward to the day when
the truth symbolised by the unleavened bread of the tabernacle will
become a reality: the nation of Israel will be saved fully and
completely. The Jewish Apostle Paul, writing to Gentile Christians in
Rome, expressed it this way:
God’s eternal purpose for the nation of Israel is revealed in those loaves of bread that were continually in his presence in the tabernacle. His plan has always been that Israel should stand in his presence without sin. There is only one way Israel can be purged of sin. Israel’s great high priest the Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth, went into the presence of God bearing his people on his heart after shedding his blood as the final and complete atonement. It is to him that Israel must look for salvation in order that they might attain the high calling of God. What thousands of years of attempting to keep the law has failed to do for Israel, Jesus can do. And it is to him that the authors of both the Tanakh and the New Testament look. |
|